The Singleton pattern allows the creation of a single instance of a class for the whole lifetime of the program. It leverages a private static field and a private constructor to achieve its goal, exposing the instantiation through a public static method or property. We can use a field initializer, the Create method itself, a static constructor, or any other valid C# options to encapsulate the initialization logic.Now let’s see how the Singleton pattern can help us (not) follow the SOLID principles:
- S: The singleton violates this principle because it has two clear responsibilities:
- It has the responsibility for which it has been created (not illustrated here), like any other class.
- It has the responsibility of creating and managing itself (lifetime management).
- O: The Singleton pattern also violates this principle. It enforces a single static instance, locked in place by itself, which limits extensibility. It is impossible to extend the class without changing its code.
- L: There is no inheritance directly involved, which is the only good point.
- I: No C# interface is involved, which violates this principle. However, we can look at the class interface instead, so building a small targeted singleton instance would satisfy this principle.
- D: The singleton class has a rock-solid hold on itself. It also suggests using its static property (or method) directly without using an abstraction, breaking the DIP with a sledgehammer.
As you can see, the Singleton pattern violates all the SOLID principles but the LSP and should be used cautiously. Having only a single instance of a class and always using that same instance is a common concept. However, we explore more proper ways to do this in the next chapter, leading me to the following advice: do not use the Singleton pattern, and if you see it used somewhere, try refactoring it out.
I suggest avoiding static members that create global states as a general good practice. They can make your system less flexible and more brittle. There are occasions where static members are worth using, but try keeping their number as low as possible. Ask yourself if you can replace that static member or class with something else before coding one.
Some may argue that the Singleton design pattern is a legitimate way of doing things. However, in ASP.NET Core, I am afraid I have to disagree: we have a powerful mechanism to do it differently, called dependency injection. When using other technologies, maybe, but not with modern .NET.
Summary
In this chapter, we explored our first GoF design patterns. These patterns expose some of the essential basics of software engineering, not necessarily the patterns themselves, but the concepts behind them:
- The Strategy pattern is a behavioral pattern that we use to compose most of our future classes. It allows swapping behavior at runtime by composing an object with small pieces and coding against interfaces, following the SOLID principles.
- The Abstract Factory pattern brings the idea of abstracting away object creation, leading to a better separation of concerns. More specifically, it aims to abstract the creation of object families and follow the SOLID principles.
- Even if we defined it as an anti-pattern, the Singleton pattern brings the application-level objects to the table. It allows the creation of a single instance of an object that lives for the whole lifetime of a program. The pattern violates most SOLID principles.
We also peeked at the Ambient Context code smell, which is used to create an omnipresent entity accessible from everywhere. It is often implemented as a singleton and brings a global state object to the program.The next chapter explores how dependency injection helps us compose complex yet maintainable systems. We also revisit the Strategy, the Factory, and the Singleton patterns to see how to use them in a dependency-injection-oriented context and how powerful they really are.
Leave a Reply